<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TRVA - Tennessee River Valley Association &#187; Publications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.trva-tcwc.org/category/publications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.trva-tcwc.org</link>
	<description>Tennessee River Valley Association</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:33:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>TRVA Brochure &#8216;Navigation on the Tennessee River&#8217; inside</title>
		<link>http://www.trva-tcwc.org/trva-brochure-navigation-on-the-tennessee-river-inside/</link>
		<comments>http://www.trva-tcwc.org/trva-brochure-navigation-on-the-tennessee-river-inside/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 03:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cline</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trva-tcwc.org/?p=565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[navigation 2 pdf
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.trva-tcwc.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/navigation-2-pdf1.pdf">navigation 2 pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.trva-tcwc.org/trva-brochure-navigation-on-the-tennessee-river-inside/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TRVA Brochure &#8216;Navigation on the Tennessee River&#8217; outside</title>
		<link>http://www.trva-tcwc.org/trva-brochure-navigation-on-the-tennessee-river/</link>
		<comments>http://www.trva-tcwc.org/trva-brochure-navigation-on-the-tennessee-river/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 01:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cline</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trva-tcwc.org/?p=557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[navigation pg 1pdf
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.trva-tcwc.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/navigation-pg-1pdf.pdf">navigation pg 1pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.trva-tcwc.org/trva-brochure-navigation-on-the-tennessee-river/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tennessee Waterway Assessment Phase II</title>
		<link>http://www.trva-tcwc.org/tennessee-waterway-assessment-phase-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://www.trva-tcwc.org/tennessee-waterway-assessment-phase-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 17:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cline</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trva-tcwc.org/?p=457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[R081205.TWWAII
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.trva-tcwc.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/R081205.TWWAII.pdf">R081205.TWWAII</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.trva-tcwc.org/tennessee-waterway-assessment-phase-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tennessee River Locks and Dams</title>
		<link>http://www.trva-tcwc.org/tennessee-river-locks-and-dams/</link>
		<comments>http://www.trva-tcwc.org/tennessee-river-locks-and-dams/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 05:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cline</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trva-tcwc.org/?p=342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.trva-tcwc.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/damsandlocks.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-343" title="damsandlocks" src="http://www.trva-tcwc.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/damsandlocks.jpg" alt="damsandlocks" width="542" height="249" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.trva-tcwc.org/tennessee-river-locks-and-dams/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USACE Nashville District Map</title>
		<link>http://www.trva-tcwc.org/usace-nashville-district-map/</link>
		<comments>http://www.trva-tcwc.org/usace-nashville-district-map/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 05:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cline</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trva-tcwc.org/?p=325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[



]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.trva-tcwc.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/DistrictMap.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-336 alignleft" title="DistrictMap" src="http://www.trva-tcwc.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/DistrictMap.png" alt="DistrictMap" width="602" height="384" /></a><img src="file:///C:/DOCUME~1/Kaye/LOCALS~1/Temp/moz-screenshot-4.png" alt="" /></p>
<p><img src="file:///C:/DOCUME%7E1/Kaye/LOCALS%7E1/Temp/moz-screenshot-3.png" alt="" /></p>
<p><img src="file:///C:/DOCUME%7E1/Kaye/LOCALS%7E1/Temp/moz-screenshot-2.png" alt="" /></p>
<p><img src="file:///C:/DOCUME%7E1/Kaye/LOCALS%7E1/Temp/moz-screenshot-1.png" alt="" /><img src="file:///C:/DOCUME%7E1/Kaye/LOCALS%7E1/Temp/moz-screenshot.png" alt="" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.trva-tcwc.org/usace-nashville-district-map/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chickamauga Lock Fact Sheet</title>
		<link>http://www.trva-tcwc.org/chickamauga-lock-fact-sheet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.trva-tcwc.org/chickamauga-lock-fact-sheet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cline</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trva-tcwc.org/?p=289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TRVA Chick 2009
Chickamauga Lock Replacement
Description: The US Army Corps of Engineers completed a feasibility study of structural deficiencies at the existing lock in March 2002 at the request of the Tennessee Valley Authority, and recommended replacement of the lock. In February 2003, Congress authorized a 110-foot x 600-foot replacement lock and provided funding for a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.trva-tcwc.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/TRVA-Chick-20092.doc">TRVA Chick 2009</a></p>
<h1>Chickamauga Lock Replacement</h1>
<p><strong>Description: </strong>The US Army Corps of Engineers completed a feasibility study of structural deficiencies at the existing lock in March 2002 at the request of the Tennessee Valley Authority, and recommended replacement of the lock. In February 2003, Congress authorized a 110-foot x 600-foot replacement lock and provided funding for a construction start in December 2003. The project includes relocation of roads and bridges.</p>
<p><strong>Background:</strong> Chickamauga Lock is seven miles northeast of Chattanooga at Tennessee River Mile 471. The 60 feet x 360 feet lock has been in operation since 1940. From 1997 to 2003 annual tonnage passing through the lock ranged from 1.9 to 2.7 million tons. Currently some 1.3 million tons of traffic pass through each year. Soon after construction, TVA recognized that an alkali aggregate reaction problem, commonly called concrete growth, existed throughout the project. This expansion of concrete leads to stability concerns throughout the structure and misalignment of mechanical components. Engineering reliability studies indicate that the probability of an event with unacceptable, possibly even catastrophic results, increase significantly after 2010. The problem will continue to affect lock operations, and at some point the probability of such an event would cause TVA’s Dam Safety Officer to permanently close the lock to protect the public downstream of the project and TVA’s investment in other features of the project.  TVA and the Corps have determined the lock could remain open until at least 2010 with an aggressive maintenance program, but costs to maintain will begin to exceed replacement costs.</p>
<p>In February 1999 TVA provided funds of  $1.5M to initiate feasibility studies for a Chickamauga Lock replacement. A Chief’s Report was signed in May 2002 recommending construction of a 75-foot x 400-foot replacement lock adjacent to the existing structure. The FY2003 Energy &amp; Water Development Appropriation authorized a 110-foot x 600-foot lock replacement and provided funds of $2.8M for design of road and utilities relocation, model construction and testing, and subsurface exploration to determine foundation conditions for the new lock.</p>
<p>A groundbreaking ceremony was held on June 18, 2005 to initiate the Road and Bridge Relocation Contract of $6M. This work was completed in February 2007. The 3-year cofferdam construction contract of $83M was awarded in September 2006. FY 2007 funds of $27M were used for construction of the cofferdam and to continue lock design. The Corps initiated a Limited Reevaluation Report (LLR) of Chickamauga Lock’s costs and benefits to better position the project for FY2010 budgeting. FY2008 funds of $34.6M were used to continue construction of the cofferdam and lock design.  Funding of $42M was included in the President’s budget for FY2009 to continue cofferdam construction and lock component design.</p>
<p>The project is cost-shared 50/50 with the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. The total project cost is currently estimated to be $375M with an estimated lock completion date of 2015. Delays beyond that point will increase this cost estimate. Average annual benefits are $5.7M (October 2004 dollars). Approximately $173M was expended through FY2009, leaving a balance of approximately $202M to complete the project.</p>
<p><strong>Importance:</strong> Chickamauga Lock is the gateway to the upper Tennessee River serving 318 miles from Chattanooga to Oak Ridge and Knoxville, Tennessee. This reach of the river provides navigation to the U.S. Department of Energy’s facilities at Oak Ridge and two nuclear power plants that serve the region. Commodities traversing Chickamauga Lock have origins or destinations in 17 states in the South, Midwest, and Mid-Atlantic regions, traveling an average 1,400 miles. Traffic forecasts by the Corp’s of Engineers’ Navigation Center indicate that tonnage levels will grow to about 11.3 million tons by 2060. Chickamauga Lock has an average locking time per tow of almost 8 hours, the highest in the Ohio River System. Only four locks in the System have a higher average delay time and none have a higher processing time. Recreational boaters use the lock at a rate of 6 to 1 over commercial vessels. In 2008, 3,985 recreational craft locked through, making the Chickamauga Lock the second busiest lock for recreation on the entire Ohio River system.</p>
<p><strong>Current Work:</strong> American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funding of $62.5M is being used to fund the completion the cofferdam dam contract, mitre gate and culvert valve fabrication plus fabrication of bridges to be used during lock construction, and construction of lock approach beams.</p>
<p><strong>Status:</strong> $1M funding for FY2010 will allow completion of work already under contract.  Without an immediate solution to the Inland Waterway Trust Fund insolvency, the cofferdam will be completed in the summer of 2010, the water will be pumped out of the structure and tested for integrity, water will be returned and on-site construction will be suspended until Trust Fund funds become available. With two other higher priority Inland Waterway construction projects requiring the entirety of the funds at current levels, suspension of construction at Chickamauga will last more than a decade without a meaningful solution to the Trust Fund insolvency. In that period, TVA will likely close the existing lock to all traffic out of concerns for safety resulting in the Tennessee River losing 181 miles of commercially navigable waterway in addition to 61 miles of the Clinch River, 29 miles of the Little Tennessee River, and 21 miles of the Hiwassee River.</p>
<p align="center">
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.trva-tcwc.org/chickamauga-lock-fact-sheet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kentucky Lock Addition Fact Sheet</title>
		<link>http://www.trva-tcwc.org/kentucky-lock-addition-fact-sheet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.trva-tcwc.org/kentucky-lock-addition-fact-sheet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cline</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trva-tcwc.org/?p=273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kentucky Lock
Kentucky Lock Addition
 
Description: The Water Resources Development Act of 1996 authorized The Kentucky Lock Addition project, located at Tennessee River Mile 22.4 in western Kentucky. The project consists of a new 110-foot x 1200-foot lock to be located landward and adjacent to the existing 110-foot x 600-foot lock, which will be used as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.trva-tcwc.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Kentucky-Lock3.doc">Kentucky Lock</a></p>
<h1>Kentucky Lock Addition</h1>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Description:</strong> The Water Resources Development Act of 1996 authorized The Kentucky Lock Addition project, located at Tennessee River Mile 22.4 in western Kentucky. The project consists of a new 110-foot x 1200-foot lock to be located landward and adjacent to the existing 110-foot x 600-foot lock, which will be used as an auxiliary lock. Due to delays experienced and projected at the existing Kentucky Lock, a 1992 Feasibility Study recommended the addition of the new larger lock. In addition to the new lock, other major project features include a new two-lane bridge for U.S. Highway 62, and a single-track bridge for the P&amp;L Railway, Inc. across the Tennessee River just below the dam. Five additional secondary bridges related to the relocation of Highway 62 and the P&amp;L Railway, the relocation of four-east bank existing TVA transmission towers, and the construction of four more towers on the powerhouse island. Numerous other utility relocations, environmental mitigation features, and enhanced tail-water fishing access as mitigation for closure of TVA’s Taylor Park Campground are necessary.</p>
<p><strong>Background:</strong> Kentucky Lock, completed in 1945, is the lowermost lock on the Tennessee River and is the gateway for the 12 locks located upstream on the Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers. Products with origins or destinations in 20 states pass through the system of Kentucky and Barkley Locks. Over 80% of the commercial tows hauling these products pass through Kentucky Lock instead of Barkley Lock because of difficult and costly navigation on the Cumberland River below Barkley Lock. Since most of the tows are greater than 600 feet in length, they must perform a time-consuming “double lockage” to transit through the existing 600-foot Kentucky Lock. This results in average delays of four to over six hours per tow in the last five years, the highest of any lock in the Ohio River System. Since the traffic levels are expected to grow in the near future, these delays will also increase. From 1997 to 2008 annual tonnage passing through the Kentucky-Barkley system has ranged from 35 to 43 million tons. Recent traffic forecasts indicated that tonnage levels would range from 51.8 and 54.9 million tons by 2020. It costs a tow well over $400 per hour wait at the lock. Construction of a new 1200-foot lock will eliminate the delay time in the near term and drastically shorten it for the forecasted levels past the year 2020. An additional regional benefit will be the creation of over 500 construction jobs during peak construction.</p>
<p>Without a new lock in place, delays at the existing lock are expected to average 8 ½ hours per tow by 2020 resulting in an increased transportation cost in excess of $24M per year. Average annual benefits attributed to a new lock are $70M (Oct 03 dollars). Based on an estimated construction cost of $734.5M and expenditures through FY2009 the new lock has a remaining benefit-to-remaining cost ratio of 3.7 to 1 and a benefit-to-cost ratio of 2.5 to 1, both at an interest rate of 7%.</p>
<p>The project is cost-shared 50/50 with the Inland Waterway Trust Fund. The total project cost is estimated to be $734.5M with an assumed completion date of 2016, the earliest expected opening of the new lock for traffic, but this will require substantial funding levels for each year through 2016. At reduced funding levels, the project’s completion date would be extended accordingly. Delays beyond 2016 will increase this cost estimate. Construction on this project commenced in July 1998. Kentucky Lock has already slipped its completion date by 9 years resulting in greater than $200M in transportation benefits foregone. Further delays will result in additional navigation benefits foregone. Approximately $272M was expended through FY2009, leaving a balance of $462.5M to complete the project. As of November 2009 the project is 38% complete. The Kentucky Lock was appropriated $22.33M in the FY2009 Omnibus Appropriation Act. Funding allocations provided through FY2009 are $279M.</p>
<p><strong>Current Work: </strong>FY2010 funding of $0.945M is being used to continue the existing $100M Bridges Superstructure Contract. The Superstructure contractor substantially completed the P&amp;L Railway Bridge and U.S. Highway 62 Bridge over the Tennessee River in FY2009. Transition of the railroad and highway to their new alignments is planned for the fall of 2009.</p>
<p><strong>Status: </strong>American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 will provide $58.0M to complete lock design, complete remaining construction work on the $100M Superstructure Contract, and fund the next lock construction contract, the Upstream Lock Monoliths. Without an immediate solution to the insolvency of the Inland Waterway Trust Fund, construction is expected to be suspended at the completion of ARRA funded contracts (early in FY2012) and will not resume for possibly more than a decade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.trva-tcwc.org/kentucky-lock-addition-fact-sheet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers Ports and Terminals Directory</title>
		<link>http://www.trva-tcwc.org/tennessee-and-cumberland-rivers-ports-and-terminals-directory/</link>
		<comments>http://www.trva-tcwc.org/tennessee-and-cumberland-rivers-ports-and-terminals-directory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cline</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trva-tcwc.org/?p=233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TRVA publishes a Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers Ports and Terminals Directory and map of Public Riverports on the Tennessee and Cumberland Waterways available free of charge. To request your complimentary copy of either or both use the Contact Us tab from the main page of www.trva-tcwc. org. Provide your full name and complete mailing address. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TRVA publishes a Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers Ports and Terminals Directory and map of Public Riverports on the Tennessee and Cumberland Waterways available free of charge. To request your complimentary copy of either or both use the Contact Us tab from the main page of www.trva-tcwc. org. Provide your full name and complete mailing address. We will respond by email and forward your requested publications via the U.S. Postal Service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.trva-tcwc.org/tennessee-and-cumberland-rivers-ports-and-terminals-directory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
